When Microstock Makes Me Feel… Well… Micro
Lincoln Adams | September 13, 2007 @ 12:20 pmI’ve been trying to jumpstart my photography hobbies again, and as a result I’ve been looking into ways I could profit off some of the images I take. After some research and Googling, I learned about how some amateur photographers have been able to generate a pretty decent monthly income by submitting their portfolios to microstock agencies. Due to their nature, you only get a percentage of the profits for every photo downloaded or sold, but the more photos that get accepted and placed in the database, the more chances you’ll have of seeing your income steadily go up. In addition, they take all the guesswork out of building your own portfolio store, and provide a much needed marketplace to help monetize your images, something you wouldn’t be able to do on your own unless you were already lucky enough to have a high profile website. As hard as it might be to believe, I am unfortunately not one opf those people.
From what I read, iStock and Shutterstock were the two most popular microstock sites, and those photographers who joined and been accepted have done very well with them, especially Shutterstock. So I decided to join the party too.
After all, my photos aren’t doing anything for me just sitting on the hard drive. Why not sell them and start padding my income a little? Maybe with the extra cash I can buy some niceties that’ll help me impress the ladies and finally get me a date for those lonely Friday nights.
After making my decision, I quickly went to work. I upgraded my Photoshop software with the Noise Ninja plugin, then spent hours sifting through my photos, picking out the best ones, then running them through Noise Ninja to get rid of any digital and noise artifacts, adjusted the color tones here and there where needed, and by the end of the day I had ten gorgeous photos I felt would easily pass inspection.
I submitted my photo samples to Shutterstock, and got back a response a few hours later:
5061175 Rejected
5061178 Rejected
5061181 Rejected
5061184 Rejected
5061187 Rejected
5061190 Rejected
5061193 Rejected
5061196 Rejected
5061199 Rejected
5061202 RejectedRegards,
Shutterstock Support
Crikey, I hadn’t seen this much rejection since I last logged on to eHarmony. Apparently I’ve arrived very late in the microstock game here, and the competition to get accepted into agencies like Shutterstock has become so fierce now that even professional photographers are being rejected.
Well that’s just great. If only I could go back to 2005 so I could give myself a good slap across the face and tell that idiot, “Hey you schmuck! Go check out those microstock sites before they start getting popular! You can make some real coinage man!”
*Sigh* Always too little, too late.
On the upside, I can apply again in 30 days. But now that Shutterstock has basically deemed my entire portfolio to be utter crap, I’ll have to start all over again.
I guess I’m not much of a photographer after all.
Related Posts:
- The Ultimate Blogger’s Toolbox - More than 80 links to tools and resources to help improve your blogging experience (33)
- Hot off the Reuters Wire (1)
- Anti-Valentine’s Day Images (11)
- Another Milestone Reached (10)
- Why are girls on dating sites so ugly? (42)
Tags: artifacts, competition, hard drive, high profile, hobbies, images, income, iStock, making money, marketplace, microstock, niceties, noise ninja, photography, Photos, photoshop, portfolio, portfolios, profits, rejection, ShutterStock
Categories: Lincoln's Personal Log
(
Print This Post
| | 766 views )




(No Ratings Yet)




4 Responses to “When Microstock Makes Me Feel… Well… Micro”
Quote
Lincoln,
do not take the rejections too personal. Most photographers are rejected the first time, when they applied to shutterstock. Microstock is not only a way to make good money, but also to learn lots about photography.
I wish you all the best with or without microstock.
Jan
Quote
Thanks Jan, I appreciate the encouragement.
I know microstock isn’t the only way to make money, but it does seem to be the easiest way for now. Ideally I’d like to build my own portfolio store here in the future so I can sell my photos directly. Maybe once my site has been online long enough and gets good traffic I’ll be able to do that.
Quote
Hey Lincoln,
Good news: Shutterstock have a well-documented bug. If your application is rejected with no reasons beside the rejection notice, it was caused by the bug and not by them rejecting your shots! Another hint that this is the case is that it happens very soon after you apply. Usual inspections take a day or more.
Shutterstock are actually pretty good with giving you feedback on your shots. They are not in the habit of rejecting 10 out of 10 without giving reasons.
I suggest contacting their support or finding an appropriate place to post in the forums. I’m sure they’ll re-evaluate your photos!
How did you go with iStockphoto??
Lee.
Quote
Hi Lee,
I traded emails with ShutterStock and 4 of my images turned out to be rejected for lack of commercial value. I don’t know how they would have faired in terms of quality either.
As for iStock, 2 of my samples were approved but the third one kept getting rejected. I only have one more try and I’m now required to upload three brand new samples. I was SOOOOO close.
I’ll have to go and take brand new photos that are more likely to pass inspection, but at least it was a good learning experience for me. before I was just taking photos for myself. Now armed with a purpose I’m learning to be more careful on how I frame my shots.
It does appear now that the market is so hyper competitive that unless I have $50,000 worth of equipment, a long line of swimsuit models at my beck and call, and become an Adobe Photoshop guru, I can just forget about getting accepted to either of these agencies.
Oh well, I won’t lose anything by trying again next month.
Quicktags: